Sunday, April 15, 2012

Black Noise


"Sometimes you have to beat a nigger to teach him a lesson.  Don't worry, you'll get used to it after a while," says Black Kings gang leader J.T. in Sudhir Venkatesh's book Gang Leader for a Day.  "That's just the way it is around here" (70).

In the projects, unfortunately, that is that way it is.  Everywhere you look, you'll see drugs, violence, prostitution, and gangs. 

On the other hand, in White Noise, Don DeLillo mocks the viewpoint of an inhabitant of the exact opposite type of neighborhood: "I'm a college professor…We live in a neat and pleasant town near a college with a quaint name.  [Bad] things don't happen in places like Blacksmith" (112).  

Jack, the character who say this quote, feels completely safe and above danger because of the community he lives in.  Meanwhile, the people in J.T.'s community are accustomed to feeling threatened by the possibility of danger anywhere they go.

Sometimes, these opposite communities can be just blocks apart, so what makes them so different?  Why is it that some communities have no threat of gang violence while in others gangs dominate the town?

Some people believe the answer to this question is simply because our cultural stereotypes say it should be this way.  In other words, we have developed stereotypes that label poor minorities as criminals, and therefore, poor minorities begin to believe that they should be criminals.  This is called the "culture of violence" theory, meaning that people in poor communities are taught not to value being part of society and having a job and instead join gangs because they see no problem with it.

Don DeLillo in White Noise also mocks this idea when Jack wonders that his children might be developing symptoms just because the radio said they should: "Is it possible to have a false perception of an illusion…I wondered whether her palms had been truly sweaty or whether she'd simple imagined a sense of wetness.  And was she so open to suggestion that she would develop every symptom as it was announced?" (122).  In this case and the "culture of violence" theory, things are happening simply because people believe they should.

While I think this theory makes some sense, I don't buy it because I don't think that it's in poor people's natural culture to not value a real job and join a gang.  I think instead it's because the jobs our society leaves open to them are so undesirable that it is much more attractive to join a gang where you can have money and power.  

The gang leader J.T., who I mentioned earlier, echoes my beliefs: "So you want me to take pride in the job, and you're only paying me minimum wage?" he asks in Gang Leader for a Day.  "It don't sound like you think much about the job yourself" (28).  Before he was a gang leader, J.T. attended college and then took a job selling office supplies at a midsize corporation.  I bet you didn't expect to hear that--I certainly didn't when I read it.  That doesn't sound much like a guy who's been destined his whole life to be criminal because of where he's from; he tried to have a "normal" job.  However, he then became frustrated that he wasn't making much money and that lesser skilled whites got promoted over him, so he quit to return to gang life where he could hold a high position and get paid more.

It's not right to say J.T. was  "meant" to be a criminal because of his race or class.  He became involved with gangs because the community he was raised him presented him with no better opportunities since it is marginalized from the rest of society.  This is the true reason for why gangs come to dominate some communities and not others.  They are disconnected from other communities, who just see and hear their problems as white noise.  Or maybe I should say, black noise.

Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Is Spike Lee 'Doing the RIght Thing'?

Last week, famous film director Spike Lee retweeted what turned out to be the wrong address of George Zimmerman to his over 250,000 followers.  Zimmerman, as I blogged about last week, is the neighborhood watchman who is in hiding after he infamously shot and killed teenager Trayvon Martin but was not charged with murder because he claimed he was acting in self defense.

The address Lee tweeted turned out to be that of an elderly, retired couple who had a son with a similar name.  This couple, scared for their lives, has been forced to flee their homes in fear of people trying to kill them.

Lee has since apologized for having the wrong address, but I still don't think this is a very forgivable action.  Not because he messed up the address, but because it is never a good idea to tweet anybody's personal address.  Especially a person that is so hated.

Lee had to know that people were going to show up at the house and try to make Zimmerman's life hell, so if this address was correct and Zimmerman got hurt in any way, I believe Spike Lee should be the person to blame, but do you think he even would have apologized?

We have courts and trials for a reason, Spike, let them do their work.  We don't need you to send your mob to try to get justice.

Actions like Lee's  greatly elevate the rate of violent crimes.  By tweeting his address, Lee, who has a lot of influence over African-Americans especially given his success., is basically telling his followers that it's alright to go and hurt, maybe even kill, George Zimmerman because he was wrong first.

This "Well, he did it first, so I need to get him back," viewpoint is a very often a huge reason why people commit violent acts, and therefore people who are exposed to violence are far more often to commit violent acts because they don't perceive it as being very bad.  In fact, in a study done in a journal I came across when researching shows that the crime that African-Americans living in urban, disadvantaged neighborhoods perceive to be the most understandable (when compared to prostitution, theft, and white collar crimes) is killing a white cop who is intentionally offensive and racist.  Whether he is or not, Zimmerman is being portrayed as a racist white cop who killed Trayvon Martin out of hate, so there is obviously a large group out their who want him dead, who, when given the message from Spike Lee that it's acceptable to hurt Zimmerman believe that killing him would not only be justifiable, but it is the right thing to do.

Is it possible to stop and calm a group of angry people so that they don't get violent revenge?